Reference Library

Constans II

Byzantine Empire

Constans II, born Heraclius in 630 AD, reigned as Byzantine emperor from 641 AD until his death in 668 AD. The grandson of Emperor Heraclius, he ascended the throne as a child during severe political unrest following the death of his father Constantine III. Although officially crowned under the regnal name Constantine, historical tradition remembered him by the diminutive Constans and the epithet 'the Bearded'. His reign proved critical in weathering the rapid expansion of the early Arab caliphate, confronting religious controversy over Monothelitism, and reforming imperial administration. He transferred his imperial court to Syracuse, where he was assassinated in 668 AD.

View moreView less
Period
Byzantine Emperor: AD 641 - AD 668
Catalog Data
WikidataNomisma

Origins and Family Background

Constans II was born on November 7, 630 AD, in Constantinople, into the ruling Heraclian dynasty. At his baptism, he received the dynastic name Flavius Heraclius, linking him directly to his grandfather, Emperor Heraclius, who had liberated the empire from the Sasanian Persian threat only to face the initial surge of the Arab Muslim conquests. Constans was the son of Constantine III (officially Heraclius Constantine) and Empress Gregoria, who was herself a daughter of Heraclius's cousin Nicetas. Through both parents, the boy represented the primary dynastic line of Heraclius and carried impeccable imperial legitimacy. Constans grew up amidst profound anxiety in the imperial court. His early childhood coincided with catastrophic territorial losses in the Levant, the death of Emperor Heraclius in February 641 AD, and the fragile joint rule of Constantine III and his teenage half-brother Heraclonas. When Constantine III succumbed to tuberculosis in May 641 AD after only a few months of rule, widespread suspicion fell upon Heraclonas and his ambitious mother, Dowager Empress Martina, who were accused of poisoning him. At barely eleven years of age, Constans found himself at the epicenter of an explosive dynastic crisis.

Sources: oxford-dict-byzantium, britannica-constans-ii

Accession and the Crisis of 641 AD

The death of Constantine III unleashed intense popular and military rebellion across the Byzantine Empire. Rumors that Martina and Patriarch Pyrrhus had eliminated the rightful heir to monopolize power for Heraclonas incited furious protests in Constantinople. General Valentinus Arshakuni led troops from Anatolia to Chalcedon across the Bosporus, demanding that the young son of Constantine III receive imperial status. Unable to suppress the rebellion, Martina and Heraclonas capitulated to public and military pressure, crowning the boy as co-emperor in September 641 AD. At his coronation, he was given the formal imperial name Constantine, though historians later distinguished him as Constans. The compromise proved fleeting. The Constantinopolitan populace and military factions remained deeply hostile toward Martina's regency. In late autumn 641 AD, an armed faction orchestrated a palace coup supported by the Senate. Martina and Heraclonas were captured, subjected to mutilation (the cutting of Martina's tongue and the slitting of Heraclonas's nose to disqualify them from rule), and banished to the island of Rhodes. The eleven-year-old Constans was declared sole emperor. A regency council guided by the Senate and Patriarch Paul II governed during his youth, while General Valentinus secured the marriage of his daughter Fausta to Constans, briefly seeking imperial power for himself before being lynched by an angry mob in 644 AD.

Sources: oxford-dict-byzantium, treadgold-byzantine-state

Imperial Rule and Western Expedition

Assuming full personal control of the government around 650 AD, Constans II confronted severe military pressures and acute ideological divisions. The Arab forces under Caliph Uthman and the governor of Syria, Mu'awiya, launched devastating raids against imperial territories, captured Cyprus, and pushed into Anatolia. In 655 AD, Constans personally commanded the Byzantine naval forces at the Battle of the Masts (Phoenix) off the coast of Lycia. The battle ended in a disastrous Byzantine defeat, and the emperor narrowly escaped capture by trading clothes with a subordinate. The subsequent outbreak of the First Fitna (the Muslim civil war) gave the empire a much-needed respite, enabling Constans to negotiate a temporary truce with Mu'awiya in 659 AD and launch successful campaigns against the Slavs in the Balkans. In 660 AD, Constans executed his younger brother Theodosius on suspicions of treason, an act that alienated both the clergy and the population of the imperial capital. Deeply unpopular in Constantinople, Constans departed the eastern capital in 662 AD on an unprecedented western expedition. He traversed Greece, conducted campaigns against the Lombards in southern Italy, and visited Rome in July 663 AD, becoming the first emperor to set foot in the ancient capital in nearly two centuries. Pope Vitalian received him with solemn honors, though Constans stripped monumental bronze ornaments, including the metal roof tiles of the Pantheon, to ship them southward. Settling his court at Syracuse on the eastern coast of Sicily, Constans intended to establish a strategic base to defend Italy and North Africa, but the heavy taxation imposed on the local populace generated bitter discontent. On September 15, 668 AD, Constans was assassinated in the baths of Daphne at Syracuse by a palace attendant.

Sources: oxford-dict-byzantium, britannica-constans-ii, treadgold-byzantine-state

Administrative Reorganization and the Theme System

The reign of Constans II was a formative epoch for the structural transformation of the Byzantine state from a late antique imperial system to a militarized medieval realm. Facing the loss of rich fiscal territories in Syria, Egypt, and Mesopotamia, the central government had to adjust to sharply reduced revenues and constant military peril. In response to these existential pressures, the Byzantine administration accelerated the withdrawal and billeting of mobile field armies into distinct districts within Anatolia. Modern scholarship attributes much of the early foundation of the theme system (themata) to the institutional emergency measures enacted under Constans II and his Heraclian predecessors. Troops were settled directly on local agricultural land, linking military obligations with regional defense and reducing cash requirements from the imperial treasury. The army of Armenia formed the Armeniac Theme, the army of the East settled as the Anatolic Theme, and the elite field forces near Constantinople became the Opsikion. Constans also maintained active personal oversight of the administrative hierarchy. He was the last reigning Roman emperor to serve as ordinary consul, assuming the traditional office in 642 AD. Although the imperial bureaucracy contracted, his decisive central control over tax collection and troop redeployment preserved the territorial core of Asia Minor and enabled the empire to endure continuous external onslaughts.

Sources: treadgold-byzantine-state, oxford-dict-byzantium

Wars with the Caliphate and Western Policies

Foreign affairs during the rule of Constans II were dominated by the struggle against the rising Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates. Following the final evacuation of Alexandria in 642 AD, Byzantine attempts to recover Egypt, such as the expedition under Manuel in 645 AD, achieved only temporary success before collapse. The Arab military then established a potent naval armada, challenging imperial maritime hegemony. Beyond sea skirmishes, Muslim forces raided deeply into Anatolia and threatened imperial dominance in Armenia. Through persistent defensive actions, Constans secured a strategic border along the Taurus Mountains, leveraging internal Islamic divisions after 656 AD to secure peace and tribute. To the north, Constans actively managed the Slavic settlements in the Balkans. In 658 AD, he campaigned across Thrace and Macedonia, subduing numerous Slavic tribes and forcibly relocating thousands of Slavic captives into Anatolia to serve as agricultural laborers and military recruits. In the West, Constans pursued an assertive policy intended to retain control over Italy and the central Mediterranean. His campaigns against the Lombard Duchy of Benevento in 663 AD demonstrated imperial reach, even though he failed to capture Benevento itself. Furthermore, Constans fostered diplomatic contacts beyond the Mediterranean sphere, receiving envoys and sending an imperial embassy to the court of Emperor Gaozong of the Tang dynasty in China.

Sources: oxford-dict-byzantium, treadgold-byzantine-state

Religious Conflict, the Typos, and Cultural Shifts

Cultural life during the mid-seventh century was overshadowed by fierce theological controversies regarding the person and nature of Jesus Christ. Seeking to pacify violent religious friction between Chalcedonian orthodoxy and the Monothelite doctrine favored by Heraclius, Constans promulgated an imperial edict in 648 AD known as the Typos (Type of Faith). The edict strictly forbade all public and theological debate over whether Christ possessed one or two wills and operations, ordering the removal of Heraclius's earlier Ekthesis from the entrance of Hagia Sophia. Rather than calming tensions, the imperial silence mandated by the Typos sparked profound outrage among orthodox clergy in Rome and throughout the western provinces. Pope Martin I summoned the Lateran Council of 649 AD in Rome, which condemned Monothelitism along with the imperial edicts of both Heraclius and Constans. In retaliation, Constans ordered the arrest of Pope Martin in 653 AD. Transported to Constantinople, the pontiff was tried for high treason, publicly degraded, and exiled to Cherson in the Crimea, where he died in 655 AD. The emperor also subjected the prominent theologian Maximus the Confessor to repeated trials, brutal mutilation, and Caucasian exile for refusing to comply with imperial religious commands. These draconian measures deepened the estrangement between Constantinople and the Western Church while reflecting the autocratic religious authority asserted by the Heraclian emperors.

Sources: oxford-dict-byzantium, britannica-constans-ii

Historical Assessment and Dynastic Continuity

Constans II has frequently received harsh treatment from primary chroniclers, largely because of his severe persecution of Pope Martin and Maximus the Confessor, the execution of his brother Theodosius, and his extraction of wealth from Rome and southern Italy. Later Byzantine historians often confused his name and nickname, applying the epithet Pogonatos to him and his son Constantine IV. His assassination at Syracuse initially plunged Sicily into the brief rebellion of the Armenian usurper Mezezius, but the uprising was swiftly crushed, ensuring the smooth succession of his eldest son, Constantine IV, whom Constans had crowned co-emperor in 654 AD. Despite the negative portraits left by ecclesiastically biased sources, modern historians acknowledge Constans II as a resolute and energetic sovereign who preserved the Byzantine realm during its most perilous century. By reorganizing the field armies into defensible themes across Anatolia, fortifying the strategic crossroads of the Mediterranean, and halting the disintegration of the imperial frontiers, Constans built the structural foundation that enabled Constantinople to withstand subsequent Arab sieges. His bold western strategy demonstrated a lingering universal vision of Roman authority, maintaining an imperial presence in Italy and North Africa that endured for generations.

Sources: britannica-constans-ii, treadgold-byzantine-state, oxford-dict-byzantium

References

  1. Constans II Pogonatus. Constans II Pogonatus
  2. The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Constans II
  3. A History of the Byzantine State and Society. pp. 310-322

Coin Articles

Showing 1–1 of 1 articles

Constans II and Constantine IV: The Four-Emperor Byzantine Gold Solidus, obverseOBV
Constans II and Constantine IV: The Four-Emperor Byzantine Gold Solidus, reverseREV
Byzantine Empire
Constans II and Constantine IV659-661 AD
Gold solidus